Compared to traditional server management, HP OneView delivers
faster workload deployment 1
less time to locate
physical resources 5
2 65%: Based on the difference of traditional interconnect and adapter cost when compared to the VC Flex-10/10D solution. Compare cost of 6 Ethernet switches, 16 quad-port NICs, to 2 HP VC Flex-10/10D. ILP, May 2010.
3 40%: Based on the difference of traditional interconnect and adapter power costs compared to VC Flex-10/10D solution. Compare cost of power for 6 Ethernet switches, 16x 1 Gb dual-Port NIC LOMs, 16 quad-port NICs to 2 HP VC Flex-10/10D modules connected to 16 embedded Flex-10 adapters. This notes refers to VC FlexFabric and not VC Flex10/10D.
4 Estimate of HP delivery time for HP ConvergedSystem 300 for Virtualization
5 97%: Based on HP internal testing comparing HP OneView v1 vs. Cisco UCS as of September 17th 2013 in Houston, TX USA. Test is finding a MAC address among 640 servers. HP OneView takes about 7 seconds vs. UCS takes 260 seconds.
6 24x: Based on HP internal testing of HP OneView vs. manual operations as of September 2013. User time to add a network with HP OneView takes 30 seconds vs. manual operations takes 12 minutes.