Cut costs by 56%.
That's business value.

IDC research shows that productivity gains and cost reductions
go hand in hand with HP BladeSystem.

Get the IDC report

Compared to traditional server management, HP OneView delivers

66 X

faster workload deployment 1

97 %

less time to locate
physical resources 5

24 X

faster network
configurations 6

* Claim substantiations


1Achieving rapid business value with HP OneView

2 65%: Based on the difference of traditional interconnect and adapter cost when compared to the VC Flex-10/10D solution. Compare cost of 6 Ethernet switches, 16 quad-port NICs, to 2 HP VC Flex-10/10D. ILP, May 2010.

3 40%: Based on the difference of traditional interconnect and adapter power costs compared to VC Flex-10/10D solution. Compare cost of power for 6 Ethernet switches, 16x 1 Gb dual-Port NIC LOMs, 16 quad-port NICs to 2 HP VC Flex-10/10D modules connected to 16 embedded Flex-10 adapters. This notes refers to VC FlexFabric and not VC Flex10/10D.

4 Estimate of HP delivery time for HP ConvergedSystem 300 for Virtualization

5 97%: Based on HP internal testing comparing HP OneView v1 vs. Cisco UCS as of September 17th 2013 in Houston, TX USA. Test is finding a MAC address among 640 servers. HP OneView takes about 7 seconds vs. UCS takes 260 seconds.

6 24x: Based on HP internal testing of HP OneView vs. manual operations as of September 2013. User time to add a network with HP OneView takes 30 seconds vs. manual operations takes 12 minutes.