1. Based on internal testing and simulation, HP Jet Fusion 3D average printing time is up to 10 times faster than average printing time of comparable fused deposition modeling (FDM) and selective laser sintering (SLS) printer solutions from $100,000 USD to $300,000 USD on market as of April, 2016. Testing variables for the HP Jet Fusion 4210/4200 Printing Solutions: Part quantity: 1 full build chamber of parts from HP Jet Fusion 3D at 20% of packing density versus same number of parts on above-mentioned competitive devices; Part size: 30 cm3; Layer thickness: 0.08 mm/0.003 inches.

2. Based on internal testing and public data for solutions on market as of April, 2016. Cost analysis based on: standard solution configuration price, supplies price, and maintenance costs recommended by manufacturer. Common cost criteria: using HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 material, and the powder reusability ratio recommended by manufacturer. HP Jet Fusion 3D 4200 Printing Solution average printing cost per part is half the average cost of comparable fused deposition modeling (FDM) and selective laser sintering (SLS) printer solutions from $100,000 to $300,000 USD. Cost criteria: printing 1 build chamber per day/5 days per week over 1 year of 30 cm3 parts at 10% packing density. HP Jet Fusion 3D 4210 Printing Solution average printing cost per part is 65% lower versus the average cost of comparable FDM and SLS printer solutions from $100,000 to $300,000 USD and is 50% lower versus the average cost of comparable SLS printer solutions for $300,000 to $450,000 USD. Cost criteria: printing 1.4 full build chambers of parts per day/5 days per week over 1 year of 30 cm3 parts at 10% packing density on fast print mode.

3. Based on HP’s unique Multi-Agent printing process. Excellent dimensional accuracy and fine detail within allowable margin of error. Based on dimensional accuracy of ±0.2 mm/0.008 inches on XY for hollow parts below 100 mm/3.94 inches and ±0.2% for hollow parts over 100 mm/3.94 inches, using HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 material, measured after sandblasting. See hp.com/go/3Dmaterials for more information on materials specifications.

4. Based on the following mechanical properties: Tensile strength at 48 MPa (XYZ), Modulus at 1700-1800 MPa (XYZ). ASTM standard tests with HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 material. See hp.com/go/3Dmaterials for more information on materials specifications.

5. Compared to manual print retrieval process used by other powder-based technologies. The term “cleaner” does not refer to any indoor air quality requirements and/or consider related air quality regulations or testing that may be applicable. The HP powder and agents do not meet the criteria for classification as hazardous according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as amended.

6. Industry-leading surplus powder reusability based on using HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 at recommended packing densities and compared to selective laser sintering (SLS) technology, offers excellent reusability without sacrificing mechanical performance. Tested according to ASTM D638, ASTM D256, ASTM D790, and ASTM D648 and using a 3D scanner for dimensional stability. Testing monitored using statistical process controls.

7. Based on internal and third-party testing for HP Jet Fusion 580 and 540 3D Printers, printing time is a fraction of the time of the printing times of comparable plastic fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA), and material jetting solutions from $20,000 USD to $120,000 USD on market as of June, 2017. Testing variables for the HP Jet Fusion 580 3D Printer: Part quantity: 1 full build chamber of parts from HP Jet Fusion 3D at 10% of packing density versus same number of parts on above-mentioned competitive devices; Part size: 30 cm3; Layer thickness: .08 mm/0.003 inches.
Competitor testing variables are comparable.

8. Available in most countries, subject to Terms & Conditions of HP Limited Warranty and/or Service Agreement. Please consult your local sales representatives for further details.

9. HP Jet Fusion 3D 4210 Printing Solution average printing cost per part is 65% lower versus the average cost of comparable FDM and SLS printer solutions from $100,000 to $300,000 USD and is 50% lower versus the average cost of comparable SLS printer solutions for $300,000 to $450,000 USD. Cost criteria: printing 1.4 full build chambers of parts per day/5 days per week over 1 year of 30 cm3 parts at 10% packing density on fast print mode.

10. HP does not design, manufacture or sell the Girbau product or provide any warranty for the Girbau products. HP believes that the information herein is correct based on the current state of scientific knowledge and as the date of its publication, however, to the maximum extent permitted by law HP EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE (EVEN IF HP IS AWARE OF SUCH PURPOSE) WITH RESPECT TO ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED. Except to the extent that exclusion is prevented by law, HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions, and damages or losses of any kind or nature that result from the use of or reliance upon this information, which is subject to change without notice. Recipients of the Girbau product are responsible for determining the suitability of Girbau products with HP Jet Fusion 3D products, ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and being aware that other safety or performance considerations may arise when using, handling or storing the product.

11. Assuming 220 working days of 30 cm³ parts at 10% packing density on Balanced print mode using HP 3D High Reusability PA 12 material, and 20% the powder reusability ratio.